Stakeholder Analysis for Enhancing Ethics in Software Development: A Scoping Review

Senyeki Milton Marebane; Ernest Mnkandla

doi:10.63158/journalisi.v7i4.1263

Senyeki Milton Marebane Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa
Ernest Mnkandla University of South Africa, South Africa

DOI: 10.63158/journalisi.v7i4.1263

Keywords: Stakeholder Analysis, Enhancing ethics, ethics goals, Software Development, Scoping Review

Abstract

Stakeholder analysis has become a crucial means for achieving software development ethical goals. This scoping review study aims to provide an overview of the extent to which stakeholder analysis has been applied to enhance ethics in software development. The study explores research studies that have been published by IEEE, ACM, Science Direct, AIS and Journal of Business Ethics. PRISMA-ScR was employed to achieve the objective of the study. Only six research studies published from 1999 to 2015 met the selection criteria for data extraction and analysis. The results show that the focus of stakeholder analysis is on moral impulse, risk identification, stakeholder interactions, stakeholder classification and impact level. Furthermore, stakeholder analysis for enhancing ethics in software development is prevalent to empower the voiceless stakeholders, risk management and stakeholder mapping and quantification for measuring stakeholder impact on projects. The analysis of the results reveals several research gaps such as unavailable empirical studies beyond 2015, concentration only on requirements engineering and lack of studies on stakeholder analysis on emergent technologies. The implications of this study point to the need for more guidance and expanded use of stakeholder analysis across the complete software process to benefit software teams and ongoing research to harness the potential of this theory on enhancing ethics in the emergent technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Ominde, E. G. Ochieng, and T. Zuofa, “Multilateral analysis of stakeholder integration, project complexity and project performance on information technology (IT) projects,” Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag., vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 709–740, 2025, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-02-2024-0135.

V. Vujović et al., “Project planning and risk management as a success factor for IT projects in agricultural schools in Serbia,” Technol. Soc., vol. 63, p. 101371, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101371.

L. B. G. Figueiredo Filho, M. Bouzon, and D. de C. Fettermann, “An analysis of the effects of stakeholders management on IT project risks using Delphi and design of experiments methods,” Benchmarking An Int. J., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 713–734, 2022, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-10-2020-0549.

I. Muller, W. Hussain, and J. Grundy, “So who is impacted anyway - A preliminary study of indirect stakeholder identification in practice,” in Proceedings - 15th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, CHASE 2022, 2022, pp. 36–40. doi: 10.1145/3528579.3529168.

M. Collins, D. Gordon, A. Becevel, and W. O’mahony, “Incorporating Digital Ethics Throughout the Software Development Process,” in 14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED), 2022. doi: 10.21427/QN74-9E40.

D. Ajiga, P. A. Okeleke, S. O. Folorunsho, and C. Ezeigweneme, “Navigating ethical considerations in software development and deployment in technological giants,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Updat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 050–063, 2024, doi: 10.53430/ijeru.2024.7.1.0033.

A. Mitchell, D. Balasubramaniam, and J. Fletcher, “Incorporating Ethics in Software Engineering: Challenges and Opportunities,” in 29th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC, IEEE, 2022, pp. 90–98. doi: 10.1109/APSEC57359.2022.00021.

A. Deshpande and H. Sharp, “Responsible AI Systems: Who are the Stakeholders?,” in AIES 2022 - Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 2022, pp. 227–236. doi: 10.1145/3514094.3534187.

J. Morley, L. Floridi, L. Kinsey, and A. Elhalal, “From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2141–2168, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5.

K. Aaltonen, “Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 165–183, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.001.

P. Eskerod, M. Huemann, and G. Savage, “Project Stakeholder Management - Past and Present,” Proj. Manag. J., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 6–14, 2015, doi: 10.1002/pmj.21555.

S. Marebane and E. Mnkandla, “Analysing Selected South African e-Government Failures through the Theory of Unintended Consequences,” in IST-Africa 2023 Conference, M. Cunningham and P. Cunningham, Eds., Tshwane: IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.23919/IST-Africa60249.2023.10187874.

A. Pouloudi, “Aspects of the stakeholder concept and their implications for information systems development,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1109/hicss.1999.772776.

R. Alidoosti, P. Lago, M. Razavian, and A. Tang, “Ethics in Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review,” Vrije Univ. Amsterdam, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009.

S. Miles, “Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 142, no. 3, pp. 437–459, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2741-y.

A. L. Friedman and S. Miles, “Developing stakeholder theory,” J. Manag. Stud., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00280.

R. E. Freeman, R. Phillips, and R. Sisodia, “Tensions in Stakeholder Theory,” Bus. Soc., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 213–231, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0007650318773750.

A. Deshpande and H. Sharp, “Responsible AI Systems: Who are the Stakeholders?,” AIES 2022 - Proc. 2022 AAAI/ACM Conf. AI, Ethics, Soc., pp. 227–236, 2022, doi: 10.1145/3514094.3534187.

J. Morley et al., “Operationalising AI ethics : barriers , enablers and next steps,” AI Soc., vol. 38, pp. 411–423, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01308-8.

D. Gotterbarn and S. Rogerson, “Responsible analysis for software development: creating the software development impact statement,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 15, pp. 1–40, 2005, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.01540.

P. Kandaswamy, Hemlata, G. P. Singh, and M. K. Ahmad, “Comparative Evaluation of Procalcitonin and Interleukin-6 as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Sepsis,” J. Clin. DIAGNOSTIC Res., vol. 12, no. 10, pp. UC17–UC21, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2018/37394.12185.

A. Pouloudi and E. A. Whitley, “Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: Gaining insights for drug use management systems,” Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 1997, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000252.

R. W. Woolridge, D. J. Mcmanus, and J. E. Hale, “Risk Assessment: An Outcome-Based Approach.,” IEEE Softw., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 36–45, 2007, doi: 10.1109/MS.2007.54.

M. Rahman, M. M. Moonira, and F. T. Zuhora, “A systematic methodology and guidelines for software project manager to identify key stakeholders,” Int. J. Res. Comput. Commun. Technol., vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 509–517, 2015.

A. Mishra and D. Mishra, “Applications of Stakeholder Theory in Information Systems and Technology,” Inz. Ekon. Econ., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 254–266, 2013, doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.24.3.4618.

X. Gan and L. Guo, “A framework for stakeholder analysis in construction projects,” Open J. Bus. Manag., vol. 2, pp. 43–55, 2014, doi: 10.2495/MIIT132352.

J. Wang, J. Ge, and Q. Lu, “A review of stakeholder analysis,” in 3rd International Conference on System Science, Engineering Design and Manufacturing Informatization, ICSEM 2012, IEEE, 2012, pp. 40–43. doi: 10.1109/ICSSEM.2012.6340802.

J. Kujala, S. Sachs, H. Leinonen, A. Heikkinen, and D. Laude, “Stakeholder Engagement: Past, Present, and Future,” Bus. Soc., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1136–1196, 2022, doi: 10.1177/00076503211066595.

A. Karale, “The Challenges of IoT Addressing Security, Ethics, Privacy, and Laws,” Internet of Things, vol. 15, p. 100420, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.iot.2021.100420.

S. Pasricha and M. Wolf, “Ethical Design of Computers: From Semiconductors to IoT and Artificial Intelligence,” IEEE Des. Test, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2024, doi: 10.1109/MDAT.2023.3277815.

A. Mabina, N. Rafifing, B. Seropola, and T. Monageng, “Challenges in IoMT Adoption in Healthcare : Focus on Ethics , Security , and Privacy,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 3162–3184, 2024, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v6i4.960.

A. Fuggetta, “Software process: A roadmap,” in Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, ICSE 2000, 2000, pp. 25–34. doi: 10.1145/336512.336521.

D. Robey, R. Welke, and D. Turk, “Traditional , Iterative , and Component-Based Development : A Social Analysis of Software Development Paradigms,” Inf. Technol. Manag., vol. 2, pp. 53–70, 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1009982704160.

M. Yilmaz, R. V. O’Connor, and P. Clarke, “A systematic approach to the comparison of roles in the software development processes,” Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 290 CCIS, pp. 198–209, 2012, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30439-2_18.

W. Orr and J. L. Davis, “Attributions of ethical responsibility by Artificial Intelligence practitioners,” 2020. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713842.

T. Chowdhury and J. Oredo, “AI ethical biases: normative and information systems development conceptual framework,” J. Decis. Syst., 2022, doi: 10.1080/12460125.2022.2062849.

S. J. Sutterfiled, S. S. Friday-Stroud, and S. L. Shivers-Blackwell, “A case study of project and stakeholder management failures: lessons learned,” Proj. Manag. J., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 26–35, 2006.

T. C. Lin, C. L. H. Chang, and T. T. Tseng, “A study of knowledge use effectiveness in IS department–A human agency perspective,” Inf. Technol. People, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 115–139, 2023, doi: 10.1108/ITP-06-2021-0479.

D. S. Kusumo, M. Staples, L. Zhu, and R. Jeffery, “Analyzing differences in risk perceptions between developers and acquirers in OTS-based custom software projects using stakeholder analysis,” in International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2012, pp. 69–78. doi: 10.1145/2372251.2372263.

K. Ignaim and J. M. Fernandes, “A Feature-based Process for Effective Stakeholder Management in Software Product Development,” IAENG Int. J. Comput. Sci., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 171–186, 2025.

D. A. Elneel, A. S. Fakharudin, E. M. Ahmed, H. Kahtan, and M. Abdullateef, “Stakeholder Identification Overview and Challenges in Requirements Engineering Prospective,” in Proceedings of 2022 2nd International Conference on Computing and Information Technology, ICCIT 2022, IEEE, 2022, pp. 314–319. doi: 10.1109/ICCIT52419.2022.9711653.

H. Sharp, A. Finkelstein, and G. Galal, “Stakeholder identification in the requirements engineering process,” in Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications 1999, 1999, pp. 387–391. doi: 10.1109/dexa.1999.795198.

M. Yilmaz, R. V O’Connor, and P. Clarke, “Software Development Roles: A Mult-Project Empirical Investigation,” ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2015.

K. Power, “Stakeholder identification in agile software product development organizations: A model for understanding who and what really counts,” in 2010 Agile Conference, IEEE, 2010, pp. 87–94. doi: 10.1109/AGILE.2010.17.

M. Templier and G. Paré, “A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 37, pp. 112–137, 2015, doi: 10.17705/1cais.03706.

M. D. J. Peters et al., “Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews,” JBI Evid. Synth., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 2119–2126, 2020, doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.

K. Yuthas and J. F. Dillard, “Ethical Development of Advanced Technology: A Postmodern Stakeholder Perspective,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 19, pp. 35–49, 1999, doi: 10.1023/A:1006145805087.